Amiodarone was more effective than placebo for conversion to SR (79.8% vs. 68.2%). CTAF, , November 2024 - February 2024, 403, Sotalol and
In SAFE-T (Sotalol Amiodarone Atrial Fibrillation Efficacy Trial), both amiodarone and sotalol were associated with a similar rate of
The list includes (but is not limited to) amiodarone, cisapride, erythromycin, ondansetron, sevoflurane, quinidine, and sotalol. vs. 90 min) than
Amiodarone is more effective in maintenance of sinus rhythm than sotalol. The adverse reaction of amiodarone on heart is less severe than that of sotalol.
According to the NIH, There is no significant difference between amiodarone and sotalol in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. However, amiodarone is more effective in maintenance of sinus rhythm than sotalol. The adverse reaction of amiodarone on heart is less severe than that of sotalol.
Amiodarone beta-blocker vs. sotalol vs. beta-blocker: 1 year: ICD shock for any reason: Fewer shocks with amiodarone beta-blocker (10.3%) compared to sotalol (24.3%) or beta-blocker alone (38.5%) Pacifico et al. Secondary prevention ICD recipients: 302: d, l-sotalol vs. placebo: 1 year: Death or ICD shock from any cause
by N Twidale 2024 Cited by 10Bolus intravenous injections of verapamil, flecainide and amiodarone Amiodarone vs Sotalol Study Group (2024) Multicentre randomized trial of sotalol
Fourteen patients treated with amiodarone, five with sotalol, and one with propafenone experienced adverse effects while in sinus rhythm, necessitating discontinuation of treatment (P 0.001 for amiodarone and propafenone vs sotalol).
Amiodarone vs. sotalol/propafenone at three monthsdigoxin: 16% vs. 28% beta-blockers: 18% vs. 15% calcium channel blockers: 10% vs. 12
then vs than
accept vs expect
alright vs all right
its vs it's
there vs their
waist vs waste
your vs you're, you are